BOM: NOT POSSIBE TO ACCEPT REQUEST TO APPRECIATE THE EXCHANGE RATE
In latest developments in exchange rate/fuel/inflation issue, according to leading Mongolian English language weekly “UB Post” D. Delgersaikhan, Director of the International Department at the Bank of Mongolia has said to media-
The Bank of Mongolia (BOM) announced that the gas price increase was not related to the exchange rate, however fuel importers have not reduced the price of fuel.
There are numerous additional charges to an imported product: its initial price, importation tax, the exchange rate, transportation cost and the importer’s profit.
The Agency for Fair Competition and Consumers has made conducted research on the matter and concluded that the increased exchange rate is not related to fuel price increase. Even if the exchange rate of MNT increases, the price of fuel probably will not decrease much.
Currently, the Government is planning to create a stockpile of oil and build new fuel storage. They are also researching whether it's viable to introduce a high tax on fuel in special circumstances.
Would you say that fuel importers have less access to information on currency and exchange rates?
I would disagree. There are thousands of young, educated people working in private sectors who aren't as proactive about reducing exchange rate risks.
As for BOM, we have been conducting seminars and workshops on how to reduce exchange rate risks. One of them was organized last Monday, it was the fourth training session held for fuel importers on how to reduce exchange rate risks.
What is the reason for MNT’s decreased exchange rate?
Let us look at the past 2 years. In 2010, our economy recovered quickly, gaining trust from investors, and a lot of currency was circulating in Mongolia. Additionally, mining operations
were in their initial stages, and the public demand for US Dollars was low. This caused MNT’s rate to increase by 13 percent.
In 2011, the economy had grown by 17 percent; mining operations were under heavy development and the demand for USD increased rapidly, both from public and the Government. Although the USD
input was the same, its output had increased; causing an 11 percent drop in MNT rate. In other words, the rate depends on the way we spend our income. The world economy is fragile, and it is
not wise to have too much budget loss; it will create macroeconomic instability.
We have sent numerous requests to the State Great Khural to reduce budget loss, but they are still giving out cash. I would like to point out that when the BOM warns the Government about
possible risks, they sit back and stay silent as if they do not care about it.
But when the forewarned risk becomes a reality and economic damages are inflicted, they begin looking for people to put the blame on, as usual.
Is the BOM taking actions towards dealing with drop in exchange rate?
Of course, firstly, we have a strategy that the MNT’s exchange rate should be set in a flexible manner according to supply and demand; and if the difference between supply and demand is too great or if there is an extreme instability in exchange rate due to sudden change in delay, we are always ready to intervene.
That said, we only intervene if there is an unexpected sudden fluctuation in the exchange rate. In the past 3 months, we have placed USD 300 million into circulation to ease the fluctuation.
The increase in the USD exchange rate had upset the public. Is there any way to decrease it?
Attempting to keep the exchange rate constant or forcing it either way can only end badly; we even have bad past experiences with it. If you remember, in 2008 we tried to utilize this very strategy and ended up decreasing the MNT exchange rate by 34 percent.
It was said that the BOM received a request from the National Committee on Social Welfare and Labor to bring the exchange rate of MNT back to what it was three months ago. Have you accepted this request?
As an economist, I would say that it is not possible to accept this request. It would severely damage our economy.
Firstly, investors will lose trust in us and our economy will be a lot more fragile if we begin forcing the exchange rate.
Secondly, we do not have the necessary currency reservoir to implement this strategy, and thirdly it will merge with external and internal risks that will lead to an economic recession, just like we experienced in 2009.
According to Government of Mongolia on January 30,2012, during first cabinet meeting of Government formed exclusively by Mongolian People’s Party after exit of Democratic Party from Coalition Government Prime Minister of Mongolia S. Batbold has said:
- Everyone is expecting that a lot will be accomplished by this Government. We must work productively, speedily and with real results
EXHANGE RATE/FUEL/ INFLATION ISSUE
Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy, Minister of Food and Agriculture and Finance Minister have been assigned to research and take measures to implement recommendation from
Trilateral National Committee on Labor and Social Consensus Making signed by Minister of Social Protection and Labor, President of Employers Association and President of Trade Union
Confederation regarding stabilization of exchange rate and prices of gasoline, diesel, consumer goods and some services
The committee proposed to Parliament
- Evaluate work of Bank of Mongolia and take measure in view of the Bank not taking prompt measures to stabilize exchange rate of tugrug
- Bank of Mongolia to reach consensus with Government/Prime Minister/ in case of exchange rate’s week fluctuation rising above two percent and resolve measures to take
- Establish Monetary policy Council in the office of the Governor of the Bank and include representation from state, trade unions, employers and consumers
- Assign Bank of Mongolia to urgently implement measures to have exchange rate reach levels before sudden depreciation
- Raise salaries of public servants starting from February 1 of this year
The committee proposed to Government, among other things
- Start taking measures from February 8,2012 to reduce gasoline and diesel retail domestic prices to levels before price increases
- Resolve financing for state fuel reserves, speed up work of seasonal consumption reserves
- Support by financing domestic meat producers
- Waive for certain period income taxes for MSE and micro and family businesses, raise level to levy VAT, reduce or waive personal income taxes for citizens with small and medium income, reduce bank loan interest
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS PRICES
- It has been assigned to related Ministers to research and prepare a proposal regarding a measure to reduce VAT in order to stabilize retail gasoline and diesel fuel in correlation with customs and special official taxes after February border price is clear
- Issue of purchase by direct contract of fuel reserves of 16.3 billion MNT is to be resolved
- Initial 22 billion MNT required for form 30 day state reserves and storage facilities is to resolved between Government and Parliament
BILL TO RAISE SALARIES , PENSIONS AND SOME SUBSIDIES IN FEBRUARY WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PARLIAMENT
- A bill is to be submitted to Parliament to raise in stages amount of salaries of staff of budget funded organizations, pensions and some subsidies calculating from February 1 and May 1 of this year
- Required 172 billion MNT is to be reflected in 2012 budget
- Government views that bringing up date of raising salaries of staff of state organizations it will protect citizens from increase in consumer goods price and decline in real exchange rate of tugrug as well increase their real income
Earlier, according to IMF on January 25,2011 IMF Representative to Mongolia Stephen Barnett stated following to Mongolian media
- Regarding January 2, 2012 raise by petroleum importers of fuel retail prices by Tog 300 per liter
We have not looked specifically at the petroleum market in Mongolia, so I would rather not comment on that.
However, I would like to make a general point. The cost of petroleum in a country depends on the international price of oil—typically quoted in US$--and the country’s exchange rate. So, it is natural for the price, which of course should be linked to the cost, to move with changes in global oil prices and the exchange rate.
- Regarding views of many Mongolian businessmen and economists that the Bank of Mongolia should be held responsible for the increase in petroleum prices
I disagree completely. In fact, we have consistently applauded the BOM—and continue to do so—for their management of the flexible exchange rate regime. Indeed, the tightly managed exchange
rate in 2008 was a key factor behind the last economic crisis. Therefore, we see the continuation of the flexible exchange rate regime as a critical line of defense for preventing another crisis.
This is especially important because of the irresponsible fiscal policy that has been put in place by the government. The extraordinary growth in spending is overheating the economy, leading
to high inflation, rapid growth in imports due to excessive domestic demand, and macroeconomic uncertainty—and these factors are influencing the exchange rate. The BOM is doing the right thing
by allowing the exchange rate to move in line with the evolving market conditions.
- Regarding BOM’s intervention on the FX market to reverse the recent depreciation
We support intervention to smooth excess volatility in the foreign exchange market but not to resist depreciation (or appreciation) pressure. Smoothing excess volatility is fundamentally
different then intervention aimed at targeting a specific exchange rate or preventing depreciation. In particular, under a flexible exchange rate regime the market guides the exchange rate up
or down based on evolving conditions. Intervention takes place only to smooth out the impact of say a particularly large transaction or other short-term disturbance in the market.
- Regarding Mongolia’s international reserves that now stand at over US$ 2 billion and how sufficient are they by international standards
The level of reserves is adequate to comfortably support the existing flexible exchange rate regime. Indeed, that is one of the big benefits of the current flexible exchange rate system. In this
regard, it is worth recalling how the fixed exchange rate policy in place previously was a key contributor to the last crisis. Specifically, the BOM was running out of international reserves in a destined-to-fail attempt to defend the exchange rate and the crisis came to a head as the BOM came close to running out of reserves.
The bottom-line, therefore, is that the flexible exchange rate regime in place now is critical for avoiding a repeat of that crisis. Especially critical given that fiscal policy has returned to the boom-bust ways of 2006-8.
- Regarding the reasons for the US$ appreciation in Mongolia and in contrast, globally, the US$ and Euro depreciation
As a general rule, economists are not very good at forecasting short-run (less than a year) changes in the exchange rate. Or, put differently, short-run fluctuations in the exchange rate are
inherently difficult to understand, as they reflect evolving market conditions and sentiment. Having said that, many factors could be behind the recent moves, including external considerations
(such as an increase in global risk aversion which has tended to cause the U.S. dollar to appreciate and the euro to depreciate in 2011) and domestic factors (such as concerns over
macroeconomic stability related to the government’s fiscal policy which has tended to put downward pressure on Mongolia’s currency).
- Regarding policies and measures needed down the road to appreciate the exchange rate and thereby bring down prices of goods
No policies are needed, as the BOM should not try to appreciate the exchange rate. The flexible exchange rate regime currently in place is the best policy for Mongolia. And, a flexible
exchange rate regime means that the central bank does not try to appreciate nor depreciate the rate.
The best way to control inflation is to have a more responsible fiscal policy. The extraordinary increase in government spending in 2011 and planned for under the 2012 budget are the key
drivers of rising prices of goods. The public’s well-placed concern about rising cost of living should be addressed, therefore, towards fiscal policy and not the BOM.
Chief Investment Strategist,